Here are the tables and figures for a decision analysis of the decision how to manage mild cervical dysplasia. This is a more complete and complex view of the tree than could be presented in the Journal of Family Practice 1998, Vol. 47, No. 3, pp 193-201,  in the paper by Robert M. Hamm, PhD, Vickie Loemker, MD, Kathryn L. Reilly, MD, MPH, Gary Johnson, MD, Peggy Dubois, MD, Kathleen Staveley-O'Carroll, MD, James Brand, MD, Tomas Owens, MD, and Kenneth Smith, MD entitled, "A Clinical Decision Analysis of Cryotherapy Compared to Expectant Management for Mild Cervical Dysplasia."

Text explaining the tables and figures.

Table 1: Probabilities for decision tree.

Table 2: Probabilities for the 5 invasive procedures, at each of 17 situations in Figure 1 where an invasive procedure is required.

Table 3: Measure of dysutilities of procedures.

Table 4: Variable definitions for the probabilities of related events.

Table 5: Probability of each procedure given each treatment.

Figure 1. Decision tree for management of mild cervical dysplasia.

Figure 2. First 2 branches of decision tree.

Figure 3. Internal branches of decision tree.

Figure 4. Terminal branch of decision tree.

Figure 5. Sensitivity analysis: tornado diagram comparing the effects of changing assumptions about 9 variables.

Figure 6. Two way sensitivity analysis: Dysutility of following and probability that followed dysplasia will regress.